Course Name:
Date:
Institution/Instructor:
Developer (if know):
LMS/Delivery Platform (if known):
Course Development and Instructional Design (15 points)
(0 – Missing/incomplete 1 – Developing, 2 – Acceptable, 3- Exceeding)
| # | Criteria | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Course contains syllabus that outlines goals, objectives, key dates, what students will learn, and how students will be evaluated. | |
| 2 | A rubric (or other tool) is available to ensure consistent evaluation of student work. | |
| 3 | Technology used contains the features necessary for students to participate and complete the course. | |
| 4 | Any prerequisites or necessary skills to participate in the course are outlined. | |
| 5 | Course focuses on attaining higher order thinking skills (HOTs). | |
| Course development and instructional design total | ||
Course Content (18 points)
(0 – Missing/incomplete 1 – Developing, 2 – Acceptable, 3- Exceeding)
| # | Criteria | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Content appears to be accurate and up-to-date. | |
| 2 | Content is structured in a logical progression (level of difficulty, applying new concepts/techniques to previous ones). | |
| 3 | Content is grammatically correct and error free. | |
| 4 | Content source material is cited/referenced. | |
| 5 | Content combines the use of text and media (images, videos) | |
| 6 | Content has interactive components where appropriate. | |
| Course content total | ||
Evaluation and assessments (12 points)
(0 – Missing/incomplete 1 – Developing, 2 – Acceptable, 3- Exceeding)
| # | Criteria | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assessments are aligned to learning objectives. | |
| 2 | An SME instructor assesses student submitted exercises. | |
| 3 | Assessments are authentic and project based. | |
| 4 | Students receive feedback that is specific to their work. | |
| Evaluation and assessments total | ||
Student engagement (9 points)
(0 – Missing/incomplete 1 – Developing, 2 – Acceptable, 3- Exceeding)
| # | Criteria | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social interaction between students and instructor as required in the course (discussion/forum posting, video conferencing). | |
| 2 | Posting/interaction guidelines are made clear to students and instructors. | |
| 3 | Instructor available to answer student questions or provide additional feedback/guidance. | |
| Student engagement total | ||
Accessibility (12 points)
(0 – Missing/incomplete 1 – Developing, 2 – Acceptable, 3- Exceeding)
| # | Criteria | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Non textual elements have alt tags. | |
| 2 | Videos have captions. | |
| 3 | Text meets color contrast ratio of at least 7 (https://contrast-ratio.com/) | |
| 4 | Main body copy not below 14px. Footnotes not below 12px. | |
| Accessibility total | ||
Total Score range:
0 to 39: Poorly developed
40 to 52: Acceptably developed
53 and above: Exceptionally developed: